The Socio-Economic Rights and Accountability Project (SERAP) has filed a lawsuit at the Federal High Court in Abuja against Senate President Godswill Akpabio, Speaker of the House of Representatives Tajudeen Abbas, and the National Assembly Service Commission (NASC). The legal action concerns the alleged misappropriation of ₦18.6 billion that was budgeted for the construction of the NASC office complex.
According to the lawsuit and corroborating reports, the funds were disbursed to a company whose identity remains unclear. The initial payment, approximately ₦11.6 billion, was made in August 2020 for the construction of the complex, followed by an additional payment of around ₦6.9 billion in November 2023 for conversion work on a roof garden into office space. Despite the substantial sums, there is no public record of the contractor or visible progress on the project.
SERAP is asking the court to compel the defendants to publicly account for the ₦18.6 billion. The organization demands disclosure of the company that received the payments, including its directors, shareholders, and registered address. SERAP also seeks publication of all related procurement documents, such as assessment reports, bid advertisements, quotations from competing bidders, contract agreements, and approval from the Federal Executive Council, where applicable. The rights group emphasizes that compliance with procurement laws, including the Public Procurement Act, must be demonstrated.
The lawsuit show concerns about transparency and accountability within the legislative infrastructure. The alleged diversion of public funds and the absence of clear documentation have sparked criticism, highlighting systemic risks in public contracting practices. Observers note that the case also reflects broader frustration among civil society groups and Nigerians over repeated reports of unaccounted government expenditures at the highest levels.
The court proceedings under suit number FHC/ABJ/CS/2457/2025 will determine whether the defendants can provide credible documentation and justify the expenditure. The case is expected to set a precedent on public accountability and may influence further investigations by anti-corruption agencies, depending on the outcome of the hearings.
