Nigeria’s anti-corruption and internal security system relies heavily on three major institutions: the Independent Corrupt Practices and Other Related Offences Commission, the Economic and Financial Crimes Commission, and the Department of State Services.
Each agency was created at different times to address specific national challenges.
The ICPC was established in 2000 under Olusegun Obasanjo through the Corrupt Practices and Other Related Offences Act.
Its primary mandate is to investigate and prosecute corruption within the public sector.
The commission focuses on offences such as bribery, abuse of office and misconduct by public officials.
Read Also: Court Allows ICPC Forensic Access to El-Rufai’s Devices
The creation of the ICPC formed part of early democratic reforms aimed at restoring accountability after years of military rule.
Two years later, the EFCC was created in 2002, also under President Obasanjo, through the EFCC Act.
While the ICPC focuses mainly on corruption in government institutions, the EFCC targets financial and economic crimes.
These include money laundering, advance fee fraud, commonly known as “419”, and large-scale financial corruption.
Over time, the EFCC has become Nigeria’s most visible anti-corruption agency, leading high-profile investigations and prosecutions.
The DSS has an earlier institutional history.
It was established in 1986 under military president Ibrahim Babangida after the dissolution of the former National Security Organization.
The reform created three agencies, including the DSS, which handles domestic intelligence and internal security.
Its responsibilities include counter-terrorism, counter-espionage and the protection of senior government officials.
Today, all three agencies continue to operate under their original mandates.
The ICPC and EFCC focus on corruption and financial crimes, while the DSS manages intelligence and internal security operations.
However, public debate often centres on how effectively these institutions carry out their responsibilities.
Questions about independence, political influence and their overall impact on corruption and national security remain key issues in Nigeria’s governance discourse.
