The Kwara State Government has denied allegations that it awarded an $800 million contract to a company owned by the brother of Governor AbdulRahman AbdulRazaq. The clarification comes after the Peoples Democratic Party (PDP) accused the state government of favoritism and called for an independent investigation into the purported contract.
The state’s spokesperson dismissed the claims as “entirely false and politically motivated,” stating that no such contract had been awarded to the governor’s immediate family members. Officials emphasized that all procurement processes in Kwara are carried out in compliance with federal and state regulations.
In a statement, PDP’s Kwara chapter criticized the state government, alleging a lack of transparency in awarding contracts. The party demanded that the Economic and Financial Crimes Commission (EFCC) and other relevant authorities investigate the matter to ensure accountability.
The opposition party argued that even rumors of nepotism or favoritism in high-value contracts undermine public trust and could discourage investment in the state. PDP urged citizens, civil society groups, and media organizations to hold the government accountable.
Kwara State officials reiterated that all major contracts are subject to oversight, including approvals from the Ministry of Finance and the State Tenders Board. They highlighted that the $800 million figure cited by critics was unfounded and not reflected in official budgetary records.
The controversy arises amid heightened scrutiny of state contracts nationwide, as Nigerian citizens and watchdog groups increasingly demand transparency, proper documentation, and competitive bidding in government procurement.
While the PDP continues to call for a probe, the state government maintains that it operates with integrity and cautioned against spreading “misinformation” that could damage the state’s reputation.
The PDP has vowed to escalate its call for an independent investigation, while the Kwara State Government plans to continue publishing contract awards and procurement reports to dispel rumors. Observers note that the controversy could have implications for public confidence, investor interest, and upcoming local elections.
